The Saucony Triumph 22 and New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080v13 are the two premium daily trainers that serious high-mileage runners compare when they’re ready to invest above the standard $130-140 tier. Both cost between $160-165. Both are positioned as maximum-cushion options for runners who want the most protective foam depth available for sustained training volume. The differences — PWRRUN+‘s subtle energy return versus Fresh Foam X’s even consistency, a 4mm drop gap, and meaningfully different midsole base widths — produce shoes suited to different runner profiles at the same investment level.

ShoeBest ForApprox. PriceKey Strength
Saucony Triumph 22High-mileage daily training, subtle energy return~$160PWRRUN+ compression resistance; slightly springier than Fresh Foam X
NB Fresh Foam X 1080v13Long distance, wide base, adapted lower-drop runners~$165Widest midsole base; 6mm drop; deepest Fresh Foam X available

Saucony Triumph 22

The Saucony Triumph 22 earns its premium position through PWRRUN+‘s combination of compression resistance and energy return — two properties that the standard PWRRUN in the Ride 17 provides less of, and that Fresh Foam X in the 1080v13 provides differently.

At ~$160 and 8.1 oz (women’s), 9.4 oz (men’s) with a 10mm drop, the Triumph 22 reaches 400-plus miles before meaningful cushioning decline — compression resistance that makes it the high-mileage daily trainer that stays protective longer than standard foam compounds at equivalent training volume. This is the property that justifies its $25 premium over the Ride 17 for runners covering 40-plus miles per week: fewer replacement cycles per year at sustained protection.

PWRRUN+‘s subtle energy return produces a slightly springier underfoot feel than Fresh Foam X — it’s not the distinct snap of Air Zoom or the plate-assisted propulsion of the Endorphin Speed 4, but it provides a more lively cushioning character than the 1080v13’s more neutral foam. Runners who find maximum-cushion shoes feel dead or passive often prefer PWRRUN+‘s character; runners who specifically want uniform, neutral cushioning without any energy return character prefer Fresh Foam X.

The 10mm drop sits in the conventional daily trainer range — accessible for any runner without deliberate adaptation planning. At 9.4 oz (men’s), the Triumph 22 is lighter than the 1080v13, which matters across the multiple weekly sessions of high-mileage training.

Bottom line: The Triumph 22 is for high-mileage daily training where compression resistance and subtle energy return are the priority — PWRRUN+‘s longevity advantage and springier character at lighter weight and conventional drop.

New Balance Fresh Foam X 1080v13

The NB Fresh Foam X 1080v13 is New Balance’s most complete daily trainer — deeper Fresh Foam X than the 880v14, a wider midsole base for long-run foot accommodation, and a 6mm drop that positions it for runners who’ve adapted to lower-drop geometry. At ~$165 and 8.5 oz (women’s), 10.1 oz (men’s), it’s $5 more than the Triumph 22 and heavier per shoe in men’s sizing.

The wider midsole base is the 1080v13’s most consequential structural advantage for long-distance running. Foot swelling during extended runs expands the forefoot laterally — typically 3-5mm over the course of a 15-20 mile effort. A wider shoe base accommodates this expansion without creating the forefoot compression that narrower shoes produce in the final hours of long efforts. The Triumph 22’s midsole base is standard-width for a daily trainer; the 1080v13’s wider platform specifically addresses the swelling dimension that longer efforts produce, and this difference is most perceptible during the last 20-30 minutes of long runs.

Fresh Foam X’s even, consistent character is its primary underfoot distinction from PWRRUN+. There’s no zone of distinct firmness, no energy return peak, no variation between zones — the cushioning is as uniform from heel to forefoot as any foam in the mainstream market. This evenness suits runners who find more complex foam constructions mentally distracting during long efforts where focus on pacing matters more than mechanical feedback.

The 6mm drop is 4mm lower than the Triumph 22’s 10mm — a meaningful change for runners currently adapted to conventional 10-12mm footwear. Two to three sessions of gradual introduction is the appropriate transition approach for runners adding the 1080v13 to a rotation that currently includes higher-drop shoes.

Bottom line: The 1080v13 is for long-distance runners who’ve adapted to lower drop and want the widest available midsole base and Fresh Foam X’s even consistency — specifically appropriate when foot swelling on 15-plus mile efforts makes standard midsole width insufficient in the final miles.

The Decision Framework

Drop history is the most important variable. The 4mm gap between 10mm and 6mm isn’t vast, but for runners with Achilles history or those currently in 10-12mm daily trainers, the Triumph 22’s 10mm is immediately accessible where the 1080v13 requires brief adaptation. For runners already at 6-8mm — or those in Hoka’s lineup at 4-5mm — the 1080v13’s drop requires no adaptation at all.

Long run distance determines the midsole base advantage’s relevance. Runners whose long runs consistently reach 15-plus miles encounter the foot swelling scenario where the 1080v13’s wider base provides perceptible comfort advantage. Runners whose long run tops out at 10-12 miles don’t encounter this scenario consistently enough for the base width difference to be a deciding factor.

Energy return preference comes down to the PWRRUN+ versus Fresh Foam X character distinction. The Triumph 22’s slight springiness appeals to runners who find pure-cushion shoes passive; the 1080v13’s evenness appeals to runners who find any energy return distracting. Both provide equivalent maximum-cushion protection; the character is a feel preference rather than a performance variable.

At $5 price difference, neither shoe is a meaningful budget advantage over the other. The decision is genuinely about fit — which shoe’s specific characteristics match the runner’s combination of drop adaptation, long run distance, and foam feel preference.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is PWRRUN+ better foam than Fresh Foam X?

Neither is objectively better — they’re optimized for different properties. PWRRUN+ provides slightly better energy return and comparable compression resistance to Fresh Foam X. Fresh Foam X provides more uniform character with a wider midsole base option. “Better” depends on which property the runner values more.

Can I rotate the Triumph 22 and 1080v13 together?

Yes, with awareness of the 4mm drop difference. Using both in the same rotation means alternating between 10mm and 6mm drop within the training week — which some runners find creates inconsistency in posterior chain loading. Runners who find no issues with this variation benefit from the foam diversity; runners who are sensitive to drop changes may prefer staying within a consistent range across rotation pairs.

Which is appropriate as a sole daily trainer?

The Triumph 22 is more accessible as a sole daily trainer because its 10mm drop suits all session types without the lower-drop adaptation that the 1080v13 requires from runners in conventional footwear. The 1080v13 as a sole daily trainer suits runners already in 4-8mm footwear who want Fresh Foam X’s even consistency and wide base for all training.

How do these compare to the Hoka Bondi 8?

The Bondi 8 adds rocker geometry that neither the Triumph 22 nor the 1080v13 provides — the passive push-off assistance that reduces calf and Achilles demand per stride. For runners who specifically want rocker geometry alongside maximum cushion, the Bondi 8 is the more directly appropriate shoe. For runners who prefer conventional flat-soled geometry at maximum protection, the Triumph 22 and 1080v13 are the primary options.

Find Your Perfect Running Shoe

Triumph 22 or 1080v13 depends on your drop adaptation and how far your long runs take you. For a personalized recommendation based on your training profile, take our free quiz → and get matched to your top 3 picks in under 60 seconds.